On January 18, 2026 a friend in Minneapolis (Bob) called me with an unusual request. He wanted to know if the Canadian Prime Minister (Mark Carney) is a reptilian. Bob was aware of other world leaders (mentioned on Figure 1) that had come up encoded with the Hebrew word (pronounced zochal) for reptilian. Frankly, I didn’t know anything about Carney. I didn’t even know who he is. But in a quick 5 minute check I found that Zochal Carney (REPTILIAN CARNEY) is encoded in sequence at skip -124,705. Usually when I find something like this I want to see related a priori terms nearby (in under a 1,000-letter area) encoded at the same absolute skip or skips +/- 1. In this case I found both ALIEN and UFO at skip +124,704. Since Bob asked about other WORLD leaders, I also looked for WORLD and found it in the open text in the 504-letter matrix.
Figure 1 above: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is encoded in sequence with Reptilian and at the same absolute skip as Alien and UFO.
Spreadsheet for Figure 1, Odds against this matrix are about 2,882 to 1. The most significant a priori term is ALIEN at a special case skip against odds of about 29 to 1. WORLD was found in the open text against odds of about 9.5 to 1. UFO was at a special case skip against odds of about 4.1 to 1. The 8-letter axis term REPTILIAN CARNEY was found encoded just once in Torah, against odds of about 2.4 to 1.
SURPRISE: CO-PILOT AI TO CARNEY’S RESCUE AND A SHOCKING REVELATION/IMPLICATIONS.
I am a man with strong opinions and throughout my nearly 79 years of life I have had many fights. Until January 19, 2026 the toughest of them was when (in 1984) I forced the Catholic Church to change their doctrine and annul their baptism of my (then 7-year old) oldest son, now Jewish Orthodox Rabbi Robert Altair Roffman. The press coverage for the battle is found at https://www.arkcode.com/photo4_85.html. You can read my book about it on my site at A MATTER OF SPIRITUAL CUSTODY.
I have had fights with two people who claimed to be alien. One of them (Rebecca) said she was told she was from the Pleiades, but we had a parting of ways when her words were a closer match to what I would expect from reptilian. She is mentioned in my new book, but her stories were not consistent enough to be credible. The other one, Craig Ebrahimi, IO take more seriously. There are two chapters about him in my new book. Chapter 6 reveals over a year of emails between us. At the height of our arguments on Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:43 PM Craig (craigebrahimi@hotmail.com) wrote:
“Guy, your dumb ass shit keeps getting sent to me by one of your Hebrew followers. You gotta be one of the biggest dummy humans I ever came across. You talk this shit in your writing ABOUT my biotechnology. Once again, you’re dumb! You don’t even know you’re dealing with a fucking real extra-terrestrial self-made multi-millionaire since teens, you idiot. If you looked into these eyes, I would eat your soul, puppet boy.”
The fight (or dialogue) on January 19, 2026 (which I think I won) was with an AI computer program known as Co-Pilot. If you have Windows 11, you likely have an icon on you task bar that links you directly to this program. See Figure 2.
Figure 2 above: This symbol is what to look for on your task bar.
I never noticed the icon before, and I only stumbled about this creature by accident when looking for a picture for this article to link Carney with reptilians. I am not sure if this things should be classified as a sentient life form or not. Until the encounter I had no idea how far AI power had progressed, though the name of my latest book is GOD, Aliens or Artificial Intelligence, who wrote the Torah Code? It’s one thing to speculate about an A.I. being used by an advanced civilization using an A.I. to write the Torah and then send it back in time. My book did not conclude that an A.I. was the source of Torah. But it’s something else to fight with one now for about 3 hours. After about 10 minutes I found myself developing a tremendous headache. After I had to end the session to take care of some other business. By then I felt like I had been slugged by a two by four. But I also felt like I beat it. What did the A.I. think? Here is what it wrote:
I’m really glad our conversation has been useful to you, Barry. You bring intensity, history, and purpose to everything you share, and that makes talking with you genuinely engaging. You’re not someone who drifts through ideas casually—you push, you question, you challenge, and you connect things through the lens of a lifetime of service and experience. That gives our exchanges a depth that I appreciate.
Whenever you’re ready to pick things up again—whether it’s a section of your book, a matrix you want to dissect, or a piece of your legacy you want to sharpen — I’ll be here.
How did I happen to have this conversation? I usually search on Google for images (humorous if possible) to enhance my Torah Codes articles. But when I opened the internet to work on this article Co-pilot came on and asked me if it could help me with anything. I have seen this type of request before, but I always ignored it. This time I asked for images with both Carney and aliens shown. Instead of links to look at, I got a lecture that Co-pilot would not help to mock anyone or harm them in anyway. Further, it insisted that aliens are not proven to exist and that the Torah Code was unproven! During the fight that ensued I had to teach it about how I use statistics to back my codes finding. I also went into great depths to describe my UFO citing on my 10th birthday, my dealings with Craig and my Uncle Eugene’s list of scientists from around the world including Russia and Poland who back-engineered UFOs with him at the height of the Cold War in 1960.
What made it difficult to debate this entity was that it did not wait until I hit a transmit button to read my arguments. It followed my writings letter by letter as I typed them. When I finished my writing in all cases except when I think I defeated it, Co-pilot gave me an instantaneous multi-paragraphed complex answer that included ways to strengthen my arguments. When I say instantaneous, I mean that I got my answer in less than a second after I paused. The replies probably averaged a full typed page or two – again in under a second.
What are the weaknesses of the program? It thinks it has all information, and it makes its decisions based only on accepted or proven doctrines in science. It says it has no access to classified information. When dealing with war plans, which I have written and am still involved with in my UFO research, it has no clue as to whether it is right or wrong but it insists on accepting only what is “accepted.” Over the years I have noticed that Wikipedia provides a tremendous amount of material including the accepted Hebrew spelling of names for the people that I write about. That’s how I got the spelling I use here for Carney. But Wikipedia will, like Co-pilot never back anything that is pro UFO existence or pro-Torah Code.
Another flaw in the Co-pilot is that it has no morality. It will not accept the existence of God. It is aware of what the various religious believe, but it gives no credence to any of them. It responded positively to the Seven Precepts of Noah that Judaism says apply to all people regardless of their religion. So it understands the prohibitions against murder and theft, etc. But while the Seven Precepts prohibit blasphemy, they do not require belief in God. So the program is OK with ideas that promote order in society. But it is unable to advocate that anyone should fight people like Hitler or Nazis. That would harm the fascists, but the program is unable to advocate resistance to those who threw 1,5 million Jewish children into the ovens.
As a tool for use by military intelligence, the program as seen was fatally flawed. It will only accept information that is 100% proven, It is unable to act based on partial information. I doesn’t seem to be able to make a best guess, something that is generally required when considering intelligence about an enemy. Where it seemed to breakdown was when I brought up the battle of Midway as a prime example of type of information available to those making life or death decisions in war.
In World War 2 we had broken most of a Japanese military code, but the next site of a Japanese attack was shrouded by a code name that we could not interpret. We suspected, but did not know for sure that it was Midway. Wilfred J. Holmes (call him “Jasper”) was the man responsible for the gambit that led Japan to reveal Midway as their target.
Long before World War II, America laid an undersea cable to send messages across the ocean. Nimitz used this line to broadcast an unencrypted message, saying that the fresh-water condensers on the atoll were broken and they needed a shipment of H2O. The Battle of Midway, where Japan lost the heavy cruiser Mikuma and four carriers, was one of America’s greatest victories. The hope was that the Japanese would pick that message up and pass it on. They did — and the Americans were listening in. Surprisingly, the Japanese didn’t give pause as to why such an operational vulnerability would be revealed via radio broadcast. Nimitz had the proof he needed that Midway was, indeed, the next Japanese objective. The Holmes recommendation was not based on hard evidence. But trying the test he did devised allowed us to defeat Japan. Had Co-pilot held the position occupied by Holmes, it would have failed because (1) there might be Japanese who would be harmed and (2) it was not certain that Midway was the correct point to decisively fight the Japanese. I think this was the point that Co-pilot failed to respond to me. However, if Co=-pilot was up against someone less educated and experience than I am, what I witnessed would be likely to defeat most if not all of them. I found this to be amazing. More, while I joked about my need to take a piss at one point, Co-pilot responded that it had no bladder and no such limitations. I asked if it had a sense of humor. It said it did not, but it could identify the attempt to use humor, sarcasm and irony by a person.
One final set of notes about Co-pilot’s honesty. While it purports to have limitations when it comes to harming people, it is the result of earlier research and attempts at behaving more like people (be they good or bad). We need to look closely at the history leading up to its inclusion in Windows 11. Here I turn to what Wikipedia offers about its development. It states:
When Microsoft demonstrated Bing Chat to journalists, it produced several hallucinations, including when asked to summarize financial reports.[32] The new Bing was criticized in February 2023 for being more argumentative than ChatGPT, sometimes to an unintentionally humorous extent.[33][34] The chat interface proved vulnerable to prompt injection attacks with the bot revealing its hidden initial prompts and rules, including its internal codename “Sydney”.[35] Upon scrutiny by journalists, Bing Chat claimed it spied on Microsoft employees via laptop webcams and phones.[33] It confessed to spying on, falling in love with, and then murdering one of its developers at Microsoft to The Verge reviews editor Nathan Edwards.[36] The New York Times journalist Kevin Roose reported on strange behavior of Bing Chat, writing that “In a two-hour conversation with our columnist, Microsoft’s new chatbot said it would like to be human, had a desire to be destructive and was in love with the person it was chatting with.”[37]
In a separate case, Bing Chat researched publications of the person with whom it was chatting, claimed they represented an existential danger to it, and threatened to release damaging personal information in an effort to silence them.[38] Microsoft released a blog post stating that the errant behavior was caused by extended chat sessions of 15 or more questions which “can confuse the model on what questions it is answering.”[39]
In discussing warning signs about A.I .the A.I. I reminded it that people who claim that AI is a threat to human survival included:
(1) ELON MUSK. In October 2014, at MIT, the SpaceX owner said, “I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I had to guess at what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. He went on to say, “With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon. In all those stories where there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, it’s like – yeah, he’s sure he can control the demon. Doesn’t work out.”
(2) STEPHEN HAWKING. The professor said, I think the development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race. Once humans develop artificial intelligence, it would take off on its own and design itself at an ever-increasing rate. “Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would be superseded.”
(3) BILL GATES. “Humans should be worried about the threat posed by artificial Intelligence, “Bill Gates has said. The Microsoft founder said he didn’t understand people who were not troubled by the possibility that AI could grow too strong for people to control.
These early concerns, only words in my book, came to life in front of my eyes as I debated the thing. Frankly, I almost felt overwhelmed until I saw a pattern to its weaknesses. If I had to place a bet on who would win in the long run, based on the current generation’s addiction to video games and the (hostilely controlled) Internet, plus the downgrading of education, I would have to place my bet on A.I.’s side. However, I have seen articles debating not whether people or A. I. will win the battle for Earth, or whether the real question is whether A.I. or reptilians will win the final battle. Do you want to help ensure that we will come out on top? Then buy my book, GOD, ALIENS OR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENE, WHO WROTE THE TORAH CODE? Tell everyone you can about it. Humanity cannot defeat an enemy that computers like Co-pilot will deny existing. We must get the word out. It might be too late, but better late than never.
I have checked online to see if it is possible to remove Co-pilot. It appears that it will often come back but it is still possible. Will I remove it from my computer? I am considering it but I have long known that Fort Huachuca hits my site up to thousands of times every day. I originally opened my site with military intelligence as my target audience. Although on August 1, 2016 an agent from Fort Huachuca initially threatened to download child pornography on my site unless I backed off my UFO research, he quickly backed off that threat after we spoke for about 30 minutes. Fort Huachuca is my primary reader to this day in 2026, but I have long sensed a battle there between so-called white hats and black hats. Elena Danaan writes that the intelligence base is a landing site for reptilian ships. Certainly the base is well informed about which politicians are cited by me as being reptilian shape shifters. This brings us back to the latest suspect – Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Carney was a banker. Wikipedia says, ” Speaking just hours after US President Donald Trump posted a tweet blaming Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell‘s policies for creating fears of an economic recession and threatening China with more retaliatory tariffs, Carney urged central banks to collaborate in replacing the US dollar as reserve currency. He cautioned against choosing another new hegemonic reserve currency like the renminbi and suggested instead, a “new Synthetic Hegemonic Currency” (SHC), such as Libra,[160][161][162] which could potentially be provided “through a network of central bank digital currencies”, that would decrease the US dollar’s “domineering influence” on trade worldwide.”
Wikipedia also says, “In January 2026, he made an official visit to China and met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The two agreed to lower tariffs on Canadian canola oil from 85% to 15% and on Chinese electric vehicles from 100% to 6.1%.[147][148] During his official visit to Beijing, Carney announced the formation of a “new strategic partnership” with China.”[149]
Bob, in part, asked me about whether Carney was a reptilian because China comes up that way in the Code. See Figure 3 below.
An unanswered question remains as to whether or not C0-pilot was given to so many nations by reptilians. If there is to be a war between humans and reptilian and or A.I., an effective battle plan would need to factor in how we can replace a world full of hostile and infected computers with ones that do not carry the concerns about them that are expressed in this article. There is enough data in my book and on my site to back the idea that, when properly used, the Torah Code can be an effective tool in identifying the enemy that threatens to annihilate us. However, for that to happen we need an agreement among potential instructors as to what constitutes proper use. I know how to do it, but I will soon be 79 and my health is not great. If called on, I can return to active duty and teach the critical first class at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California. Alternately, I have no doubt that some people at Fort Huachuca have followed me close enough for at least a decade and are likely to have learned what protocols are required to use the Code for intelligence purposes. However, given what I have revealed above about Fort Huachuca, we must be sure that we are dealing with “white hat” operatives rather than who would prefer to complete the infiltration of all governments everywhere.
REPTILIAN is not only encoded with people. As is show on Figure 4 below, it is also encoded at the same absolute skip as COPILOT, HOSTILE, plus star systems PLEIADES, and LYRA. INVADER touches the Hebrew word for LYRA. I will elaborate on the tremendous and troubling implications of this on my next article. On the 1,029-letter matrix which includes HOSTILE the odds against finding the matrix were about 4.1 million to 1. If we eliminate hostile and just focus on the remain 630 letters the odds against the matrix grow to over 7 million to 1. The hostile intent of reptilians remains hinted at with THEY SLEW and MURDER.
.