MARS LANDING SITES
Updated 2/21/2017
ATTEMPTED MARTIAN LANDINGS*AND MARTIAN WEATHER DATA
| Mission | LaunchDate | Landing Date | Termination Date | Result | Weather/ Pressure Data? |
| Soviet Sputnik 24 | 4 Nov 1962 | 19 Jan 1963 | Failure. | No | |
| Soviet Mars 3 | 28 May 1971 | 2 Dec 1971 | 2 Dec 1971 | Failure. Landed, but transmission ceased within 15 seconds | No |
| Soviet Mars 6 | 5 Aug 1973 | 12 Mar 1974 | 12 Mar 1974 | Failure. Data during descent, not after landing. | No |
| Soviet Mars 7 | 9 Aug 1973 | 9 Mar 1974 | 9 Mar 1974 | Failure. | No |
| U.S. Viking 1 | 20 Aug 1975 | 20 Jul 1976 | 13 Nov 1982 | Success | Yes |
| U.S. Viking 2 | 9 Sep 1975 | 3 Sep 1976 | 11 Apr 1980 | Success | Yes |
| Soviet Phobos 1 | 7 Jul 1988 | 2 Sep 1988 | Failure. | No | |
| Soviet Phobos 2 | 12 Jul 1988 | 29 Jul 1989 | Failure. | No | |
| U.S. Mars Pathfinder | 4 Dec 1996 | 4 Jul 1997 | 27 Sep 1997 | Success | Yes |
| U.S Mars Polar Lander | 3 Jan 1999 | 3 Dec 1999 | 3 Dec 1999 | Failure. | No |
| U.S Deep Space 2 | 3 Jan 1999 | 3 Dec 1999 | 3 Dec 1999 | Failure. | No |
| British Beagle 2 | 2 Jun 2003 | 6 Feb 2004 | Failure | No | |
| U.S. MER A – Spirit | 10 Jun 2003 | 4 Jan 2004 | Still operational. | Success | No |
| U.S. MER B - Opportunity | 7 Jul 2003 | 25 Jan 2004 | Still operational. | Success | No |
| U.S. Phoenix | 4 Aug 2007 | 25 May 2008 | 10 Nov 2008 | Success | Yes |
| U.S. Mars Science Lab | 26 Nov 2011 | 6 Aug 2007 | Still operational. | Success | Yes |
| ExoMars 2016 Schiaparelli Lander | 14 March 2016 | 19 October 2016 | 19 October 2016 | Failure | No |
* Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploration_of_Mars#Timeline_of_Mars_exploration
For Mars Pathfinder, pressure was measured by a Tavis magnetic reluctance diaphragm sensor similar to that used by Viking, both during descent and after landing.
The Phoenix lander in 2008 also carried a meteorological station. However, it carried a 26-gram instrument developed by the Finish Meteorological Institute. The device is based on the Vaisala Oy sensor technology and components for the instrument which was delivered by the Micro Analog Systems Oy and Selmic Oy.
The Vikings were designed to only measure pressure up about 13.79 mbar. The Pathfinder was designed to only measure pressure up to 12 mbar. The Phoenix was limited to 5 to 12 mbar. None of these landers had equipment that could function right on Earth below an altitude of at least 68,000 feet - and that's figuring that the Tavis sensor would work past its designed 13.79 mbar level right up to 36 mbar. If they would not work right past 13.79 mbar, then the figure would be 81,000 feet above the Earth. The Tavis magnetic reluctance transducer works on the basis of converting pressure to voltage, with 0 volts at 0 mbar, 5 volts at 0.2 psia (about 13.79 mbar), which was its rating, and 15 volts maximum possible voltage allowed. After that its a real question of what would happen. The instrument was apparently designed to work well only with temperatures above -50 degrees Celsius, but it was regularly exposed to -78 C. Pathfinder was also exposed to -170 degrees Celsius at 80 km on its entry.
Planetographic latitude with west longitude. This is the coordinate system originally used in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature, and the system used for maps produced before approximately 2002. An ellipsoidal equatorial radius of 3396.0 km and polar radius of 3376.8 km are assumed.
Planetocentric latitude with east longitude. This is the coordinate system used for maps produced after approximately 2002, although the planetographic latitudes and west longitudes are also shown on printed maps for reference, and the radii on which these are based are different (3396.19 and 3376.20 km).
| LANDER | DATE LANDED | LATITUDE | LONGITUDE |
| VIKING 1 | JULY 20, 1976 | 22.48 N (Smith et al.states 22.2692 N) | 49.97 W (Smith et al.states 311.8113 E) |
| VIKING 2 | SEP 3, 1976 | 47.97 N (Smith et al.states 47.6680 N) | 225.74 W (Smith et al.states 134.0430 E) |
| PATHFINDER | JULY 4, 1997 | 19.13 N (Smith et al.states 19.0949 N) | 33.22 W (Smith et al.states 326.5092 E) |
| SPIRIT at Gusev Crater | JAN 4, 2004 | 14.5718 S | 175.4785 W (Mars globe shows 184.5W, 14.7 S) |
| OPPORTUNITY | JAN 25, 2004 | 1.95 S | 354.47 E |
| PHOENIX | MAY 25, 2008 | 68 N | 234 E |
| MARS SCIENCE LAB | AUG 6, 2012 | 4.59 S | 137.44 E (222.56W) |
Smith figures from Smith, D. E., et al. (2001), Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter: Experiment summary after the first year of global mapping of Mars, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23,689–23,722, doi:10.1029/2000JE001364.http://www-geodyn.mit.edu/mola.summary.pdf
ALTITIUDES FOR LANDERS WITH METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS:
On Earth there is a loss of about 1 inch of mercury (about 33.86 mbar) for each thousand feet ascended. Lander altitude and latitude can have an impact on pressure readings, and must be compensated for when comparing mission pressure readings. The source for the information below is a draft copy of a paper by Peter A. Taylor, et. al. (October 20, 2009) entitled On Pressure Measurement and Seasonal Pressure Variations during the Phoenix Mission. Because Pathfinder is at a higher altitude, its minimum pressure was adjusted from 670 Pa (6.7 mbar) to 698 Pa. They state that Viking 1 amplitudes are increased by a factor of 1.0455 to compare them with the Phoenix values (Viking 1 was higher, so it feels less air pressure than Phoenix) while Viking 2 values should be reduced by a factor of 0.967 to compare with Phoenix (Viking 2 was lower than Phoenix, so it should feel more pressure than Phoenix). The paper listed the mean (adjusted) pressure at sites as follows: Viking 1 year A = 7.936 mbar, Viking 1 Year B = 7.942 mbar and Phoenix 8.326 mbar. Again, the above Pathfinder pressure was listed not as a mean, but rather as a minimum.
| MISSION | ELEVATION OF LANDER IN METERS | ELEVATION OF LANDER IN FEET |
| VIKING 1 | -3,637 | -11,932 |
| VIKING 2 | -4,495 | -14,747 |
| PATHFINDER | -3,682 | -12,080 |
| PHOENIX | -4,126 | -13,537 |
| MSL | -4,400 | -14,435 |
Landing sites
Figure 1 below: MOLA map of Mars with major topographic features, landing sites, and locations of methane plumes identified by Krasnopolsky et al. (2004).